In the dynamic field of project management, effectively engaging with stakeholders plays a crucial role in ensuring project success. One popular project management framework that assists project managers in identifying and prioritising stakeholders is the Salience Model . Originating from the work of Mitchell, Agle, and Wood, this model provides insights into stakeholder classification, helping teams navigate through complex interactions and expectations. This article delves into the core concepts of the Salience Model, its practical application in differentiating stakeholder types, and compares it with grid-based models to highlight its unique features. Moreover, it addresses the potential challenges and offers tangible tools for handling transitions between stakeholder categories, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of this pivotal management tool.
Salience in the context of project management refers to the degree of attention that project managers ought to give to each stakeholder. The Salience Model offers a framework for assessing stakeholder importance through three primary attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. These attributes help determine how project managers should allocate their time and resources to address stakeholder needs effectively.
The concept of salience is pivotal in navigating stakeholder relationships because it provides a clear criterion for determining the significance of each individual or group involved in a project. By understanding and applying the principles of salience, project managers can better anticipate and manage stakeholder expectations, ultimately leading to improved project outcomes. The Salience Model utilises these attributes to create various stakeholder categories, making it easier to allocate attention where it is most necessary.
Classifying stakeholders is essential as it enables project managers to tailor their communication and engagement strategies appropriately. The Salience Model offers a systematic approach to categorising stakeholders based on their salience, facilitating a more targeted and efficient management approach. This classification helps in understanding which stakeholders need the most attention and which strategies should be employed to manage their influence effectively.
Moreover, stakeholder classification helps in identifying potential risks and opportunities within a project. By recognising different stakeholder groups, project managers can establish relevant communication channels, address concerns proactively, and ensure that stakeholder expectations are met. This strategic alignment is crucial in fostering collaborative environments and maintaining productive relationships with all parties involved.
The Salience Model can be visually represented through a Venn diagram, illustrating the intersection of the three attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Each intersecting area within the diagram correlates to a specific type of stakeholder, categorised as latent, expectant, definitive, or non-stakeholders. This graphical representation aids in comprehending the complex nature of stakeholder interactions.
By referring to this diagram, project managers can easily identify stakeholders’ salience levels, allowing them to strategically allocate resources and communication efforts. This model’s visual simplicity aids in quickly assessing stakeholders’ positions, enabling efficient decision-making and prioritisation throughout the project's lifecycle.
Latent stakeholders possess only one of the three salience attributes, meaning they hold lesser influence on the project. Although they might not demand immediate attention, project managers need to remain vigilant, as their involvement could evolve over time. This category includes dormant stakeholders with power, discretionary stakeholders possessing legitimacy, and demanding stakeholders with urgency.
Managing latent stakeholders involves monitoring them closely to prevent unforeseen impacts on the project. Keeping open channels of communication and providing occasional updates can ensure that latent stakeholders remain informed, maintaining their potential collaboration in future phases of the project or organisational activities.
Expectant stakeholders hold two of the three salience attributes, placing them in a more influential position than latent stakeholders. These stakeholders are usually anticipated to become more involved as the project progresses. Expectant stakeholders fall into three sub-categories: dominant (power and legitimacy), dependent (legitimacy and urgency), and dangerous (power and urgency).
Proactively engaging expectant stakeholders is essential for maintaining project stability. Regular meetings, updates, and consultations can help manage their expectations and keep their commitments aligned with project goals. Addressing their concerns promptly allows project managers to harness support and avert potential disruptions.
Definitive stakeholders possess all three attributes - power, legitimacy, and urgency. As key influencers in a project, they warrant the highest level of engagement from project managers. Their demands must be prioritised to ensure project success, as they have the capacity to significantly impact project outcomes.
Building a robust relationship with definitive stakeholders through intensive communication, collaborative decision-making, and transparent reporting is vital. Ensuring their satisfaction and buy-in can lead to smoother project progression and support in overcoming obstacles.
Non-stakeholders do not present any of the salient attributes and, therefore, have limited to no impact on the project. However, project managers should not overlook them entirely, as their status might change over time, morphing into potential stakeholders with evolving demands or resources.
Monitoring the environment and periodically reassessing non-stakeholders keeps project managers prepared to adapt strategies should these entities shift into more influential roles. Anticipating changes within the stakeholder landscape is crucial for minimising surprises and keeping the project trajectory steady.
Transitioning between stakeholder types often occurs as a project unfolds. Changes in organisational goals, external factors, or stakeholder needs can shift a stakeholder’s salience, requiring project managers to reassess and adjust their engagement strategies accordingly. Being responsive to these transitions ensures that all stakeholder requirements are met, sustaining project momentum.
Project managers must implement an ongoing evaluation process to identify shifts in stakeholder positions, employing regular assessments and feedback mechanisms. By doing so, managers create a dynamic and responsive strategy capable of navigating the complexities of evolving stakeholder relationships.
While the Salience Model focuses on three key attributes - power, legitimacy, and urgency, grid-based models like the Power/Interest Grid segment stakeholders based on power and interest levels. These models share the aim of prioritising stakeholders but differ in terms of their focus areas and applicability.
Grid-based models may offer simpler visualisation tools that are easier to implement for smaller projects with fewer stakeholders. In contrast, the Salience Model’s comprehensive approach can be more effective in complex scenarios, providing more detailed insights into multifaceted stakeholder relationships.
Despite its utility, the Salience Model is not without challenges. Determining the precise degree of power, legitimacy, and urgency each stakeholder possesses can be subjective, requiring careful judgement and experience. Misclassifying stakeholders might lead to inefficient allocation of resources, undermining project success.
Moreover, as stakeholder dynamics evolve, the model requires continuous updates. This demands sustained attention and adaptability from project managers to ensure that they are always operating with the most accurate and current stakeholder information.
In summary, the Salience Model serves as a valuable tool for understanding and managing stakeholder relationships within project management. By categorising stakeholders based on the attributes of power, legitimacy, and urgency, project managers can efficiently prioritise their efforts, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively. Still, inherent challenges require practitioners to maintain diligent oversight to capitalise on the model's potential, ultimately driving project success.
| Key Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Salience Model Attributes | Power, Legitimacy, Urgency |
| Stakeholder Classification | Latent, Expectant, Definitive |
| Comparison with Grid-based Models | Focuses on Power, Legitimacy, Urgency vs. Power/Interest |
| Challenges | Subjectivity, Continuous Updates Required |
The salience model is a tool used in project management to help identify and prioritise the stakeholders of a project based on their importance and influence. It considers three main factors:
By evaluating stakeholders based on these criteria, project managers can determine which stakeholders need more attention and how to engage with them effectively throughout the project.
The salience model of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is an extension of the traditional CAPM that incorporates the effects of salience, or the tendency for investors to give more weight to striking or prominent information when making decisions. Traditional CAPM suggests that the expected return on a security is determined by its systematic risk, measured by beta, in relation to the market portfolio. In the salience model, however, investors might overreact to information that stands out, such as recent news or unusual events, affecting their perception of risk and expected returns. This can lead to deviations from the predictions of traditional CAPM, as investors might overvalue or undervalue assets based on what information they find most noticeable or compelling.
The salience model of a stakeholder map is a way to identify and prioritise stakeholders based on three key attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Here's a simple breakdown:
By assessing stakeholders on these attributes, project managers can determine which stakeholders need more attention and engagement, ensuring that the most critical stakeholders are appropriately prioritised in project decision-making.
Salience theory in psychology is about how certain things stand out more than others in our minds. It explains why we pay attention to specific pieces of information that catch our eye or seem important while ignoring others. This can be influenced by factors like bright colors, loud sounds, or anything unusual or surprising. In decision-making, salience theory suggests that we often focus on the most noticeable aspects of a situation rather than all the details.
Explore our Courses
Upcoming Course Dates
IPM Competency Pathway
Corporate Training
Partnership
Academy Courses
Certification Overview
IPM Certification
IPMA Certification
PMI Certification
PRINCE2® Certification
About IPM Hub
IPM Membership
EMEA Monthly Events
Mentorship Programme
IPM Jobs Portal
All Insights & Resources
Expert Insights
Ebooks, Templates, and Toolkits
Publish Your Work
Who We Are
Faculty of Excellence
Global Advisory Board
Become a Lecturer or Volunteer
Become an Intern or Student Partner
Speak to an Advisor
